A survival clause (also known as a savings clause) is a contractual provision that specifies which rights, obligations, representations, warranties, and covenants will continue in full force and effect after the contract has terminated or expired. Without such a clause, most contractual duties end upon termination, potentially leaving critical protections (confidentiality, indemnification, warranty claims) unenforceable. The survival clause ensures that provisions requiring post-contract performance remain binding.
Every contract comes to an end, by performance, expiration, or termination. The moment a contract ends, rights and obligations that are not expressly preserved may vanish. A survival clause answers a critical question: Which promises remain binding even after the contract is dead? This is not merely theoretical. Confidential information disclosed during the contract must remain secret after termination. Indemnification for past acts must remain available. Representations made at signing may give rise to claims that only surface months after closing.
Without an effective survival clause, a party may lose the ability to enforce key protections. Courts may imply survival for certain obligations (e.g., confidentiality, indemnity for completed acts), but this is uncertain and varies by jurisdiction. The only reliable approach is an express, carefully drafted survival clause that leaves no doubt about which provisions continue, for how long, and under what conditions.
In M&A and commercial contracts, survival clauses are heavily negotiated. Buyers want long survival periods for representations and warranties (often 2–3 years or the full statute of limitations). Sellers push for shorter periods (12–18 months) and want the clause to act as a contractual statute of limitations, requiring that a claim be asserted before the survival period expires, not just that the breach occurred earlier. The precise wording matters enormously.
Survival clauses do not apply to all provisions uniformly. Performance obligations, delivery of goods, payment for services, naturally end with the contract. But certain obligations are designed to extend beyond the contract’s life. The following table distinguishes typical surviving and non-surviving provisions.
Explicitly list the sections that survive. Vague language like “provisions that by their nature should survive” invites litigation. Instead: “Sections 2.3 (Confidentiality), 4.1 (Indemnification), and Article IX (Dispute Resolution) shall survive termination.”
General reps: 12–24 months post-closing. Fundamental reps (title, authority): full statute of limitations or indefinitely. Tax reps: often full statute of limitations. Indemnification and confidentiality: usually indefinite.
A poorly drafted clause may bar claims if final resolution occurs after the survival period. Effective drafting: “…any claim for breach of a representation or warranty shall be barred unless the non-breaching party delivers written notice of such claim prior to the expiration of the survival period.” This preserves claims timely asserted even if final resolution takes longer.
Make clear that termination does not affect any claim or remedy for breach occurring before termination. Example: “Termination shall not relieve either party of any liability for breach occurring prior to termination, and all rights and remedies shall survive termination.”
To create a binding shorter limitations period, courts in many jurisdictions (including Ohio and other US states) require “unequivocal language” that the parties intend to modify the statute of limitations. Example: “The parties, intending to modify any otherwise applicable statute of limitations, agree that any claim for breach of a representation or warranty must be asserted in writing within 18 months after Closing, and any claim not so asserted shall be forever barred.”
If the contract references other documents (SOWs, exhibits), state whether their survival is separate or follows the master agreement. “The survival provisions of this Agreement shall apply to all SOWs and exhibits unless otherwise expressly provided.”
A recent Ohio federal court decision, Bidwell Family Corp. v. Shape Corp. (2024), highlights a common, and costly, drafting error. The asset purchase agreement stated that representations and warranties would survive for twelve months, and that “any claims asserted in good faith with reasonable specificity … prior to the expiration date of the applicable survival period shall not thereafter be barred.” The buyer gave no notice within twelve months. The court held that the clause did NOT unequivocally state that claims not noticed before expiration were barred. Under Ohio law, a contractual statute of limitations requires “unequivocal language” that claims are extinguished if not asserted within the period. The clause at issue only positively stated what survives (claims with timely notice) but did not unequivocally state that untimely claims are barred.
If you intend a survival period to limit the time to bring claims (a contractual statute of limitations), you must state both: (1) claims timely noticed survive; AND (2) claims not timely noticed are permanently barred, waived, and extinguished. Use unequivocal language such as: “Any claim that is not asserted in writing prior to the expiration of the Survival Period shall be irrevocably and forever barred, and no party or its affiliates shall have any liability with respect to such claim.” This is essential under the laws of states that require explicit waiver of the statute of limitations.
The terms “boilerplate” and “survival clause” are sometimes confused. Boilerplate refers to standard, form clauses that appear in nearly all contracts, such as notices, force majeure, assignment, governing law, entire agreement, and severability. A survival clause is one specific type of boilerplate, but not all boilerplate provisions survive termination. In fact, the survival clause itself is the provision that determines which other provisions (including many boilerplate clauses) remain effective after termination.
Typical boilerplate provisions like “Entire Agreement” or “Amendment” generally do NOT survive termination unless expressly listed. Conversely, “Governing Law” and “Dispute Resolution” almost always should survive, and a well-drafted survival clause will so provide.
General language like “provisions that by their nature should survive” forces courts to guess intent. Result: uncertainty and litigation. Always list section numbers.
If the survival clause is silent on reps and warranties, they may terminate at closing (merger doctrine). In Delaware, pre-closing reps may “merge” into the closing unless expressly surviving. Buyers: include explicit survival. Sellers: ensure a finite period.
Does a claim need to be asserted before the survival period ends, or finally resolved? If the latter, a diligent buyer could be barred by court delays. Draft: “asserted in writing prior to the expiration.”
Simply saying a representation “survives for 12 months” may be interpreted as the period during which it remains alive, not a bar on claims arising after 12 months. Add explicit language that claims not brought within the period are barred, and that the parties intend to shorten the statute of limitations.
Third-party claims (lawsuits) may be asserted after the survival period expires. A robust clause provides that indemnity claims survive if the underlying third-party claim is noticed before the survival cutoff, even if the lawsuit later proceeds.
When a master agreement and exhibits or SOWs have different survival clauses, conflict arises. Draft a single controlling survival clause or cross-refer explicitly.

They represents the product, and research team behind GTsetu, a global B2B collaboration platform built to help companies explore cross-border partnerships with clarity and trust. The team focuses on simplifying early-stage international business discovery by combining structured company profiles, verification-led access, and controlled collaboration workflows.
With a strong emphasis on trust, and disciplined engagement, Team GTsetu shares insights on global trade, partnerships, and cross-border collaboration, helping businesses make informed decisions before entering deeper commercial discussions.